Offline
A number of subclasses, like the barbarian and beserker for example, have thief abilities they can use when lightly armoured or unarmoured. Thieves, however, can use those abilities wearing medium armor with a reduction in success chance.
Is that an intentional difference or an artifact from older rules? I can't see making that distinction except to preserve a bit of niche protection. That makes sense, but I wanted to double check.
Thanks.
Offline
Perhaps poor execution on my part. If you look at the barbarian "climb" ability for example, it does mention lightly armoured or unarmoured, but it also tells you to reference the thief chart with the ability. At that chart, there is a footnote about wearing medium armour. This applies to the barbarian, too. (Or berserker, as the case may be.) I've made a note to make this more clear in the future printing of the game.
Offline
Ok, that makes sense. I think the word "must" is the confusing bit.