HYPERBOREA » AS&SH Layout Samples!

Ghul · 8/31/2017 11:48 am

I have posted layout samples of AS&SH 2E in the latest Kickstarter Update. Enjoy!

Cheers,
Jeff T.

Ynas Midgard · 8/31/2017 11:54 am

I just saw it, and I'm stoked. I think I might go mad by mid-late September :D

grodog · 8/31/2017 11:58 am

Looks good, Jeff! :D

Allan.

Ynas Midgard · 8/31/2017 1:14 pm

The lucky thief increased her dexterity from 17 to 18 during her career. Must be some sort of witchery!

Chainsaw · 8/31/2017 4:48 pm

Very nice!

Ghul · 8/31/2017 7:01 pm

Thanks, fellows! Wow, you have eyes like a hawk, Ynas Midgard! ;)

Grimmshade · 9/01/2017 1:17 am

Awesome! Really glad I pre-ordered! Looks great.

Caveman · 9/01/2017 5:04 am

This is good, cannot wait.

Actually the picture of the Cryomancer, is one of the question I need to know!

Am I getting this right: 4 extra Subclasses?

Cryomancer (Magician)
Purloiner (Thief)
Huntsman (Fighter)
Runegraver (Priest)

Is there another, or is that it, just the four?
I working at a City Encounter Chart and adding the different Classes as an encounter and obviously, want to add the new subclasses.

Cheers

foxroe · 9/01/2017 6:02 am

The only bit of criticism I have is that the text boxes are slightly too transparent... might be hard to read for some.

Other than that, it's awesome.
Must. Have. Book. Now.

Ynas Midgard · 9/01/2017 9:07 am

Ghul wrote:
Thanks, fellows! Wow, you have eyes like a hawk, Ynas Midgard! ;)

Thanks
It was actually David Prata's work on AS&SH 1E that convinced me editing in fact was super cool, and since then I've been doing it part time (very part time, but still). So, in a way, thank youguys ;)

Ghul · 9/01/2017 10:22 am

Caveman wrote:
This is good, cannot wait.

Actually the picture of the Cryomancer, is one of the question I need to know!

Am I getting this right: 4 extra Subclasses?

Cryomancer (Magician)
Purloiner (Thief)
Huntsman (Fighter)
Runegraver (Priest)

Is there another, or is that it, just the four?
I working at a City Encounter Chart and adding the different Classes as an encounter and obviously, want to add the new subclasses.

Cheers

That is correct, just those four.

Ghul · 9/01/2017 10:23 am

foxroe wrote:
The only bit of criticism I have is that the text boxes are slightly too transparent... might be hard to read for some.

Other than that, it's awesome.
Must. Have. Book. Now.

On the screen, it appears so, but in my test prints (600 dpi laser, HP) this is not the case; in fact the transparency is almost lost. So, I'm curiously waiting to see what the print proof looks like.

Ghul · 9/01/2017 10:24 am

Ynas Midgard wrote:
Ghul wrote:
Thanks, fellows! Wow, you have eyes like a hawk, Ynas Midgard! ;)
Thanks
It was actually David Prata's work on AS&SH 1E that convinced me editing in fact was super cool, and since then I've been doing it part time (very part time, but still). So, in a way, thank youguys ;)

That's great! I'm sure that will make Mr. Prata smile.

Caveman · 9/01/2017 12:28 pm

Ghul wrote:
Caveman wrote:
This is good, cannot wait.

Actually the picture of the Cryomancer, is one of the question I need to know!

Am I getting this right: 4 extra Subclasses?

Cryomancer (Magician)
Purloiner (Thief)
Huntsman (Fighter)
Runegraver (Priest)

Is there another, or is that it, just the four?
I working at a City Encounter Chart and adding the different Classes as an encounter and obviously, want to add the new subclasses.

Cheers
That is correct, just those four.

Cheers Jeff, great!

DMPrata · 9/01/2017 5:23 pm

Ghul wrote:
Ynas Midgard wrote:
Thanks
It was actually David Prata's work on AS&SH 1E that convinced me editing in fact was super cool, and since then I've been doing it part time (very part time, but still). So, in a way, thank youguys ;)
That's great! I'm sure that will make Mr. Prata smile.

See? See? I told you I was cool.

foxroe · 9/01/2017 9:44 pm

Ghul wrote:
foxroe wrote:
The only bit of criticism I have is that the text boxes are slightly too transparent... might be hard to read for some.

Other than that, it's awesome.
Must. Have. Book. Now.
On the screen, it appears so, but in my test prints (600 dpi laser, HP) this is not the case; in fact the transparency is almost lost. So, I'm curiously waiting to see what the print proof looks like.

Awesome!

Doctor_Rob · 9/02/2017 3:29 am

Ghul wrote:
foxroe wrote:
The only bit of criticism I have is that the text boxes are slightly too transparent... might be hard to read for some.

Other than that, it's awesome.
Must. Have. Book. Now.
On the screen, it appears so, but in my test prints (600 dpi laser, HP) this is not the case; in fact the transparency is almost lost. So, I'm curiously waiting to see what the print proof looks like.

Ok, good to know. I tend to print out my PDFs for use at the table, and this sort of issue is an important consideration (very much so for DriveThru stuff; I've seen reveiwers comment on this sort of thing).

Looks good; can't wait until September (616 pages - wow!).

Last edited by Doctor_Rob (9/02/2017 3:31 am)